Posts Tagged ‘jobs’

Prosperity depends on healthy free markets

Monday, August 2nd, 2010

John Chettle’s piece in the Weekly Standard absolutely says it all.  The President’s mistakes all stem from two things.  First, he has the wrong orientation towards economics.  He believes – quite sincerely but wrongly – that free markets are the problem and that unless they are minutely controlled by Washington they will do bad things to America.  Second – and this is where he differs from other liberal Democrats like Hillary Clinton – he is not experienced enough to be willing to question his ideology when it conflicts with reality.  A wiser leader would know not to have tried the current policies in the first place.  A more experienced leader would be open to the obvious reality that the policies are failing and in fact have become the problem.  So the President continues to do the wrong things in the worst possible way:  to burden the economy with taxes and regulations and to impose the taxes and regulations with so much uncertainty that business people literally do now know how to plan for the future.

All of this would be interesting if it were just an academic exercise.   But it’s not.  It’s hurting people, and of course people who were most vulnerable in the first place are in the greatest danger now.

Moving forward, it will be necessary to reverse these policies but also to discredit them.  The objective must be to restore the bipartisan consensus – which the President has disrupted – that prosperity is essential to everyone’s agenda, that prosperity depends on healthy free markets, and that the government must therefore respect the private economy.

Unemployment Emergency

Tuesday, July 6th, 2010

Good governance is rooted in common sense. Here is a common sense truth: Everyone’s agenda depends on a prosperous economy. The Great Generation knew the human cost when bad times last for a long time. They grew up in the Depression. They knew that without prosperity we can not nurture and educate our children, protect our communities, or care for the poor. Whether you are a liberal or conservative, your agenda depends on America’s ability to produce jobs, create wealth, and expand opportunity. And that depends on a vibrant free market economy.
We are currently governed by a set of people who have no respect for the genius of the private sector. Their first instinct is to tax, regulate, and intimidate free enterprise. And as long as that is the case, the policies they enact will continue to suppress economic growth. That is the fundamental reason the recession went on so long, and the “recovery” continues to look and feel a lot like a recession.

Where are the jobs?

Tuesday, June 8th, 2010

It was not surprising that the markets tanked after Friday’s jobs report. Of the 431,000 jobs created, just 41,000 of them were private sector jobs – the rest: temporary Census workers. As Chair of the House Committee on Small Business, Sen. Talent learned how the small business owner thinks. They are risk takers, but they are not foolish. The current uncertainty caused by changing regulations and health care burdens has caused them to pull back in a big way.The private sector can’t be the economic engine that we need it to be, until the government realizes the best thing it can do for the economy is provide a reasonable (and certain) regulatory frame work and cut burdensome taxes.
These disjointed government policies are a living example of Obama’s lack of executive and management experience.

Climate legislation reveals Washington is out of touch

Thursday, May 13th, 2010

Yesterday, Sen. Kerry and Sen. Lieberman introduced a new climate bill.

1)      The bill contains a number of new taxes and job killing regulations.  It can not be good for the economy.  Don’t they know how concerned people are about their jobs and how close the economy already is to the edge?

2)      So America is going to impose taxes on itself, and sacrifice jobs, to deal with climate change.  Is it in order to ask what China and India are going to do?  Are the Chinese going to continue building coal plants at a rate of one per week, while we pay huge extra costs for green energy?  In 1997, the Senate voted UNANIMOUSLY not to pass legislation burdening the American economy in order to deal with climate change unless other countries were doing the same.  Yet that is exactly what they are trying to do now.  How does it help reduce greenhouse gases to ship our jobs overseas to countries that don’t care about the environment?

California: A Not So Golden State

Wednesday, May 5th, 2010

One of the themes of our Foundation is that what is going on in Washington – huge deficit spending, government policies that frighten and discourage entrepreneurs – violates far more than conservative principles and goals.  These actions violate what used to be consensus thinking across the political spectrum, and they undermine what everyone wants to achieve.

California is the poster child for what we are saying.  What philosophical agenda has been advanced in California?  For that matter, what interest has really been advanced?  In the short term, perhaps, the public employee unions get more money and power.  But the gravy train has to hit a wall sometime, and when it does, the government workers and retirees will suffer like everyone else.  And what about the schools whose funding will be cut?  The vulnerable people who will be less safe as law enforcement budgets go down?  The loss of opportunity for California’s young people?  What part of the political spectrum – from the left to the right –  benefits from  bankrupting the government and destroying the economy?

And what will happen to our country if the current leadership in Washington makes the whole country look like California?

National Debt Forum Transcript

Tuesday, April 13th, 2010

A Titanic Mess

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

Sen. Talent’s OpEd on the government’s mad-cap approach to spending was recently published by National Review Online.

A Titanic Mess

Side effects

Tuesday, March 30th, 2010

The Heritage Foundation is beginning a series called “side effects” which will discuss the consequences of the health care bill. Here is the first addition.
It’s a reminder that what happens in government matters to real people facing real issues. The employees of AT&T are going to have lower quality health care because of the bill.

Small business owner makes a case for AHP’s

Wednesday, March 3rd, 2010

Today we will get our first glimpse of the President’s latest health care proposal. President Obama would be wise to talk with the small business owner from Philadelphia who wrote the following Op-Ed: Health care, jobs are linked.  He effectively builds the case for a health care proposal that Sen. Talent championed in the House and Senate: Association Health Plans (AHP’s).  AHP’s would allow small businesses to pool together through national trade associations to offer insurance to their employees.  This is a small fix that would go a long way toward covering the millions of uninsured and it would create certainty in the business community that could give business owners the confidence they need to hire again.  AHP’s were filibustered in the Senate despite strong bipartisan support in both chambers by many of the same politicians still in office today.



More government regulations will NOT create jobs

Monday, March 1st, 2010

There’s a great KC Star article on new regulations coming out of Washington.

When I chaired the Small Business Committee in the House, I did a number of hearings on regulations.  I found two things.  First, regulatory costs disproportionately hurt small business, because typically such businesses don’t maintain a large legal section to deal with them.  Second, when you dig into the weeds of individual regulations, you often find that they hurt business while in practice generating little or no social benefit at all.  That’s going to happen now, because the Administration is going to heavily regulate the emission of carbon dioxide here in the United States – and there isn’t a chance of that happening in China and India.  That means much higher energy costs if you do business in the United States relative to those countries.  So we can say goodbye to a lot of American jobs, and for nothing. The total amount of Co2 in the air globally will actually go up because China and India are much less careful about that currently than America is.

Fewer jobs and more greenhouse gases.  Our government at work.